Posts Tagged ‘alignment’

Succession Planning Below the C-Suite

Thursday, January 27th, 2011

An article in today’s Wall Street Journal entitled Sudden Leader Loss Leaves Firms in Limbo, says that according to research done by the American Management Association, more than one-fifth of senior managers say that their companies are “not at all prepared” in the event of a sudden loss of a key member of the company’s senior management team.

While this is obviously important and thanks to Apple, currently receiving a lot of  attention, the issue goes much deeper.  Most of the writing and research I read about the need for succession planning, is focused on senior management.  To ensure effective strategy execution, more attention needs to be paid to talent requirements below the executive suite.

For example, at a biotech firm I worked with several years ago, when the program manager of a critical drug development project left unexpectedly, it resulted in the costly delay of the launch of the product.  Management at the top remained constant – they simply didn’t have anyone prepared to take over the reigns.

A manufacturing executive I spoke with the recently, is concerned about the loss of an entire layer of seasoned mid-level managers, who in the past, had provided much of the informal  mentoring and on-the-job training of young managers moving up in his organization.    He’s worried that while they have plenty of talent, they don’t have the necessary breadth of knowledge to handle unforeseen events when they occur.

When organizations lose core elements of their internal institutional knowledge, it can be perhaps not as externally obvious, but equally devastating as losing a member of senior management.

To help make these key talent requirements more visible, companies must explicitly identify the critical talent resources they will need to execute as a part of their strategic planning process, and develop contingency plans in the event of unplanned departures.

Has this happened in your organization?  How did you address (or not)?

What Makes a Good Boss?

Monday, August 2nd, 2010

Almost 25 years ago, an article in ‘Business’ magazine described the ten qualities employees most wanted their bosses to possess.  A lot has changed in the world since then, but these (with some updating by me) still look good.

1. Establishing organization clarity

a.  Establishing clear goals and standards

b.  Communicating group (not just individual) goals

c.  Involving people in setting goals (not just dictating them)

d.  Delegate responsibility clearly

2.  Encouraging open, two-way communication

a.  Open and candid when dealing with people

b.  Honest, direct and to the point

c.  Establishing a climate of openness and trust

3.  Willingness to coach and support people

a.  Supportive and helpful

b. Working constructively (and decisively) to correct performance problems

c.  Going to bat for subordinates

4.  Providing ‘objective’ recognition

a. Recognize good performance more often than criticizing performance problems

b. Tying rewards to excellence of job performance (vs seniority or personal relationships)

5.  Establishing ongoing controls

a.  Following up in a timely manner

b.  Giving ‘real-time’ feedback on how subordinates are doing

6.  Selecting (and keeping) the right people

a.  Both bringing the ‘right’ people on and exiting those who don’t fit

7.  Understanding the financial implications of decisions

8.  Encouraging innovation and new ideas

a.  Surprisingly, this was seen as important regardless of how conservative or traditional the company

9. Making decisions and ensuring the organization executes successfully

10.  Demonstrating high levels of integrity

a.  Doing the ‘right’ thing, both internally an externally

Anything you would add or omit?  Which one is the most important to you?

Clarity, Alignment and Focus are Keys to Success in any Market

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

When Anne Mulcahy took over as head of Xerox in 2001, few believed that anyone could save the company, particularly an unknown ‘insider’ with limited financial acumen, who had joined the company right out of college. The company was facing bankruptcy, in the midst of a SEC investigation, and was staggered with a debt load of $19 billion. Despite all these obstacles, succeed she did, bringing Xerox back to profitability by 2005 and out of debt by 2006. In a speech Mulcahy gave at MIT’s Sloan School of Management, she had this to say about her success: “The best high-performing companies aren’t typically led by big name CEO’s, but by leaders who build great teams. When people ask me how this company made so much progress so quickly, I think they want to hear that there was something particularly brilliant about the strategy or the planning. The reality is: it was the alignment of the people around a common set of goals.”

Baxter International’s CEO, Robert Parkinson, who was named by Forbes as one of 2008’s ‘Best CEO’s You Don’t Know’, credited his company’s success to its clear focus and discipline. In the article, he was quoted as saying, “Too often organizations get distracted by competition, economic uncertainty or growth for growth’s sake. A successful leader is able to keep the organization focused on its priorities and relentless execution of its strategy.”

When I was Chief Administrative Officer at Hyperion during the height of the dot com implosion, we were able to course-correct only after the executive team aligned ourselves and the company around ‘1 – 3 – 5’; ONE clear vision of the future (Desired Future State), THREE ‘over-arching’ Business Priorities, and FIVE Strategic Assaults.

What are your experiences and/or learnings about successfully managing through crisis? I’d love to hear them. Cheers, Amelia